1. Identify property and unit
What needs fixing?
Collects complete repair details, access permission, safety risk, and priority for property and facilities teams.
What needs fixing?
Is there any safety risk or active leak?
Can maintenance enter if you are not home?
What needs fixing?
Is there any safety risk or active leak?
Collect maintenance reports by phone. Ask for property, unit, issue, urgency, safety risk, access instructions, and photo availability. Escalate emergencies and save a work order summary.
{
"outcome": "Maintenance report intake outcome",
"fields": [
{
"description": "caller name captured during the call.",
"name": "caller_name",
"required": true,
"type": "text"
},
{
"description": "phone number from caller id captured during the call.",
"name": "phone_number_from_caller_id",
"required": true,
"type": "text"
},
{
"description": "property captured during the call.",
"name": "property",
"required": true,
"type": "text"
},
{
"description": "unit captured during the call.",
"name": "unit",
"required": true,
"type": "text"
},
{
"description": "issue captured during the call.",
"name": "issue",
"required": true,
"type": "text"
},
{
"description": "urgency captured during the call.",
"name": "urgency",
"required": false,
"type": "text"
},
{
"description": "access permission captured during the call.",
"name": "access_permission",
"required": false,
"type": "text"
},
{
"description": "photos available captured during the call.",
"name": "photos_available",
"required": false,
"type": "text"
}
]
}
AI: Hi, I am an AI call workflow for Maintenance report intake. What needs fixing?
Caller: My kitchen sink is leaking under the cabinet.
AI: Is there any safety risk or active leak?
Caller: It is slow, but the cabinet is wet and maintenance can enter tomorrow.
Make the first screen and opening line match what the caller will actually get. For Maintenance report intake, the promise should be narrow enough that a caller understands the purpose before sharing details or scanning a QR code. Avoid broad claims like "we can help with anything"; a specific promise produces cleaner calls and clearer follow-up.
Decide which fields are required before the call can be considered complete. A practical first version should capture caller name, phone number from caller id, property, then send a summary that the workflow owner can act on without replaying the call. If a field is not used for routing, qualification, scheduling, or review, remove it from the first launch.
Write down the cases that should not be automated. Use human review for active leak, electrical hazard, lockout, injury, tenant threatens legal action, access conflict so the workflow stays useful without pretending to handle every edge case. Review the first real calls before connecting higher-risk actions or expanding the workflow.
Use it when the call is repeatable, the team already knows the information they need, and the caller benefits from speaking instead of filling out a form. It works best for apartments, hoas, hotels.
The first question should identify the caller goal and gather enough context to continue naturally. For this template, start with: "What needs fixing?". Keep follow-ups short so the caller does not feel like they are reading a form over the phone.
Save a structured result with caller name, phone number from caller id, property, plus a summary, completion status, and handoff reason when needed. The owner should be able to act on the result without interpreting raw transcript text.
Human handoff should trigger when the caller needs judgment, asks for a person, gives conflicting answers, or matches one of the workflow-specific rules: active leak, electrical hazard, lockout, injury, tenant threatens legal action, access conflict.
The template includes prompt, questions, output fields, sample transcript, handoff rules, and a live call entry point.